Class Action Litigation Class Actions Current Affairs Litigation Massachusetts Decisions Privacy Class Actions Standing US District Court - Mass
May 14, 2025 / May 14, 2025 by Samih Eloubeidi
On January 31, 2025, in Campos v. TJX Companies, Inc., No. 24-cv-11067, the District of Massachusetts granted a motion to dismiss a class action due to the plaintiff’s lack of standing. The court concluded that the named plaintiff’s claims regarding the intrusion of her privacy by “spy pixels” could not be successful because there was […]
Read more »
Tagged
Class Action Litigation Class Actions Current Affairs First Circuit Decisions Litigation Massachusetts Decisions US District Court - Mass
February 1, 2024 by Sarah Remes
In Part 2 of our series on our Massachusetts and Boston-based COVID-19 tuition refund class action suits, we reviewed the legal backdrop of this wave of class action litigation and explored some common pitfalls in education-based claims, noting that even where cases are able to proceed based on adequate framing of the claims and underlying […]
Current Affairs Supreme Court
April 19, 2017 / February 26, 2019 by Josh Dunlap
This week, Justice Gorsuch donned his black robes and began hearing arguments alongside his new colleagues on the Supreme Court. With his elevation to the high court, Justice Gorsuch assumes many new responsibilities. Some, of the lighter kind, include opening the door during conferences with his colleagues and assuming oversight of the Court’s cafeteria menu. […]
Current Affairs First Circuit Decisions Securities Class Actions
November 30, 2016 / February 26, 2019 by Mark Rosen
On November 28, 2016, the First Circuit upheld the dismissal of all but one of the class action securities fraud claims against Cambridge, MA drug company, ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., reaffirming the exacting pleading standards that enable defendants to put an early end to reflexive stock-drop lawsuits. In doing so, the First Circuit also adopted strict […]
Class Certifications Current Affairs Supreme Court
March 27, 2015 / February 26, 2019 by mindgrub
This week the Supreme Court resolved a split among federal appellate courts over whether a statement of opinion in a company’s registration statement can be actionable under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 if the speaker actually holds the stated opinion. The high court ruled that such opinions are not actionable as an “untrue statement of material fact” simply because they turn out to be wrong. But, taking another “midway position” on a divisive issue of securities class action litigation, the court left the door open...
